| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Anti CCP sentiment by the dissaffected minority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I see some people blowing off steam in defence of Goons, but very little opinion about the topic related matter. Actually want to wade into the topic with your view of how you see Sony and its relationship with CCP? Will you actually go on record...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 10:31:00
|
2. Anti CCP sentiment by the dissaffected minority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KrakizBad wrote: Metagaming, what is it? Suggest starting your own thread for different topic material. Not interested in diversions. It's simple. Are you for Sony or against, happy to accept hesitations. Mainly just hoping to see sentiment...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 05:26:00
|
3. Anti CCP sentiment by the dissaffected minority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ai Shun wrote: Judge Solace wrote: Though I'm not what you think I am anyhow. This post is merely openening discussion surrounding a recgonition with a pattern of behaviour. No, it is continuing discussion. In a different place. From the ...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 05:06:00
|
4. Anti CCP sentiment by the dissaffected minority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tarsus Zateki wrote: Show a little flexibility. Thought i was by discussing it with you? I have given you an opportunity to clarify your current views. Not my fault if originally you just wanted to just brush the opportunity under the carp...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 04:40:00
|
5. Anti CCP sentiment by the dissaffected minority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So do Goons now believe that CCP in conjunction with SONY didnt throw the Mittani "under a bus"? Seems have been a re-ccuring message, and now posts are popping up with similar sentiment to make people feel "bad" about the developers. Will the G...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 04:13:00
|
6. Anti CCP sentiment by the dissaffected minority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tarsus Zateki wrote: Judge Solace wrote: Tarsus Zateki wrote: Judge Solace wrote: Selinate wrote: The can of worms. It will not shut. Don't know why you would want to bury this observation when it is obviously disccusing recent t...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 03:56:00
|
7. Anti CCP sentiment by the dissaffected minority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tarsus Zateki wrote: Judge Solace wrote: Selinate wrote: The can of worms. It will not shut. Don't know why you would want to bury this observation when it is obviously disccusing recent trends in the behaviour of forum posting. Jus...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 03:54:00
|
8. Anti CCP sentiment by the dissaffected minority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Selinate wrote: The can of worms. It will not shut. Don't know why you would want to bury this observation when it is obviously discussing recent trends in the behaviour of forum posting.
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 03:49:00
|
9. Anti CCP sentiment by the dissaffected minority - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I find it interesting to see that before Mittens messed up big time that most of his lackeys where happy in the understanding that he had lots of wonderfull freinds at CCP and that EVE was great. Now we see anti-CCP and anti-SONY propoganda appea...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 03:36:00
|
10. The future of high sec? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Even with your incorrect and cynical portrayal of High sec it's a lot better than Mittens' vision perhaps?.
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.04 03:08:00
|
11. Goons! What are they good for? Absolutly Nothin. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Judge Solace wrote: It's about revenge. Remember the state of the Goonion rant where Mittens threw his toys out the pram in response to CCP's decision where the chronology goes: You're being pretty silly you know that?...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.01 08:18:00
|
12. Goons! What are they good for? Absolutly Nothin. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's about revenge. Remember the state of the Goonion rant where Mittens threw his toys out the pram in response to CCP's decision where the chronology goes: "I'm so pissed right now", "So here's what we are going to do". Motivations being to tes...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.04.01 08:12:00
|
13. How extended is the concept of Sandbox for this Burn Jita thing ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Serene Repose wrote: See if I have this one straight. Goons said they'll "burn" Jita. (I imagine Mitt sees it as his Reichstaag.) So...CCP needs to change the rules (in this game of no rules) for this special event? Why? Because in this sandbox...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.03.31 18:11:00
|
14. How extended is the concept of Sandbox for this Burn Jita thing ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Judge Solace wrote: ApophisXP wrote: More concord sent to jita means that there will be less concord elsewhere meaning other places would be less secured :o I would like to see this, and explore other systems with next to ...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.03.31 18:02:00
|
15. Give the Mittani back his CSM position. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Prince Kobol wrote: Spenser for Hire wrote: I totally canGÇÖt believe I reactivated my account in order to speak out on behalf of The Mittani, but seriously, DonGÇÖt you think you guys have gone a bit too far??? You re-activated your acc...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.03.31 17:53:00
|
16. How extended is the concept of Sandbox for this Burn Jita thing ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ApophisXP wrote: More concord sent to jita means that there will be less concord elsewhere meaning other places would be less secured :o I would like to see this, and explore other systems with next to no concord that are 1.0 systems :o Con...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.03.31 17:51:00
|
17. How extended is the concept of Sandbox for this Burn Jita thing ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marcus Shamonomonom wrote: I'm just guessing but i think the issue would be programming, and how not cost effective it might be to waste time on it for just one day/however long jita is targeted. Not that some of the devs might not like the id...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.03.31 17:47:00
|
18. How extended is the concept of Sandbox for this Burn Jita thing ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
VaMei wrote: Judge Solace wrote: "CONCORD contains a division called the Secure Commerce Commission which is jointly run by the major New Eden empires to ensure a safe and universally regulated trade environment." http://wiki.eveonline.co...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.03.31 17:41:00
|
19. How extended is the concept of Sandbox for this Burn Jita thing ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
VaMei wrote: Judge Solace wrote: Tippia wrote: Dead Loss wrote: 2 - CONCORD is a part of the Eve universe, and if in reality this was a sandbox, CONCORD would also evolve with the information and knowledge of the universe. No, that do...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.03.31 17:35:00
|
20. How extended is the concept of Sandbox for this Burn Jita thing ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Dead Loss wrote: 2 - CONCORD is a part of the Eve universe, and if in reality this was a sandbox, CONCORD would also evolve with the information and knowledge of the universe. No, that does not follow. CONCORD is part of the ...
- by Judge Solace - at 2012.03.31 17:27:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |